NOVEMBER 27, 2018

Tags:

Freelance vs. In-house Developers: What to Choose for Your Project?

Written by: Andrey Zagorodniy

Why Distinguishing Between In-house Vs. Freelance Development Is Important

 

At first glance, it might seem that the difference is insignificant. Both categories of developers create and maintain software, so why even bother comparing in-house vs. freelance software development?

 

The truth is that different projects require different approaches. A suitable solution for a small startup might be a waste of resources for a bigger company.

 

In other words, you should hire in-house or freelance developers given the situation you are in.  

 

What is In-House Development?

 

If a company employs and houses a team of programmers, analysts, and technicians to create software products using its capacities, it is called in-house development. Although it is a reliable method providing you with greater control over all of the development process stages, it still possesses several drawbacks.

 

What is Freelance Development?

 

Freelance development implies that you hire one or several independent contractors to work on your project. Using the services of freelancers is much cheaper than sustaining an in-house team of employees, but the risks are also higher.  

 

Freelance or In-house Development: What to Choose?

 

To understand what would be a better option, you should first clearly understand, how your business can benefit from using either in-house or freelance developers. Analyzing the pros and cons of in-house vs. freelance software development will help you make a better decision.

 

Working with in-house developers

 

 

When to hire in-house developers

 

Startups for sale

 

If you have a prospective idea that you know will interest a bigger company, you might want to hire an in-house team of highly skilled developers to research and develop it.

 

Let’s say you start a business on substituting conventional mobile devices with foldable interactive screens. A tech giant such as Apple gets interested in your groundwork. The company board holds a meeting, and discuss your foldable displays. “This technology looks promising, we could use it in our new iPhone,” they decide.

 

In this case, the said tech giant is likely to buy everything you worked on: the idea, the prototypes, the team of developers.

 

In the battle of freelance vs. in-house development, this is the argument in favor of in-house teams.

 

Software development companies

 

One thing is when you need a software specialist to do maintenance and routine, or to cover one-time tasks. Another is when your company lives on developing serious software: corporate security solutions, antivirus programs, accounting solutions for businesses, and so on.

 

You might want to rely on in-house developers in this case. A well-coordinated team ran by a CTO, every member of which knows their duties and can work on their set of specific tasks on a regular basis, is a better option here, than freelancers.  

 

Сompanies in need for ambassadors

 

If your business implies meeting with numerous people all of which are related to software development, you might need a person able to perform representative functions.

 

Companies with consistent workloads

 

If you know your business is going to operate with regular workloads that are unlikely to run out or decrease, it makes more sense to hire an in-house team of developers.

 

Cash cows

 

If your business generates stable revenues and your burn rate does not shorten your runway, (in other words, if your financial situation is stable)  you might consider hiring in-house developers. Treat it as a form of investment into an even safer future.

 

Companies working in the business-to-government model

 

 

If you work as a contractor for the government, confidentiality might be one of your biggest concerns. Signing a nondisclosure agreement with a freelancer is an unreliable measure. Contrarily, working with in-house developers is safer regarding security and privacy. The same refers to big corporations

 

In-house development: strengths

 

The benefits of in-house development include:

 

  • Univocal ownership rights. Since you run the company developing software, you own the source code as well

 

  • Security. No third-parties are involved in the development process, and confidentiality is easier to keep

 

  • Efficient crisis management. It is easier to mobilize an in-house team to address emergencies than freelancers scattered across the globe.  

 

  • Homogenous working environment. All members of an in-house team will most likely have the same cultural background, which minimizes the risk of conflicts and misunderstandings within the team

 

  • The high quality of the work done. A collective of developers working together on a regular basis can produce a product of better quality.  

 

  • Regular maintenance and support of the created products. Bug fixing, optimization, tech support, and other similar procedures are more comfortable with an in-house team.

 

In-house development: weaknesses

 

  • High costs. Sustaining a team of in-house developers implies additional expenses in the form of taxes, insurance payments, paying office rent, etc.

 

  • Training difficulties. When working with freelancers, you can hire a new specialist with a specific set of skills you need at the moment. In the case of in-house developers, you have to train the existing ones. It can be costly and distracts them from doing their actual job.

 

  • Communication. Project and account management must be at a high level to ensure effective communication of ideas and tasks within the team.

 

  • Recruiting is time-consuming and resource-intensive. You need not just to find a suitable candidate, but onboard them and provide them with a workplace and equipment required for work.

 

  • Slow adaptation. Software development is an ever-changing field, and as such, it requires developers to update and expand their knowledge continually. It may be a problem for in-house specialists, who mostly spend their time working on the same tasks over and over again.  

 

  • 8-hour workday. Whatever emergency occurs, it may have to wait until the next working day. If it happens before the weekend – well, so much the worse for you.

 

Working with freelance developers

 

 

Before reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of freelance development, it is crucial to understand, in which cases you should hire freelancers.

 

When to hire freelance developers

 

Remote companies

 

If you work in a distant place with little to none access to the qualified labor force, hiring freelance developers might be a panacea.

 

Companies operating on overheated markets

 

If your business is located in the area where developers with ridiculously high hourly rates are snapped up like hot cakes, you might want to outsource for freelancers from afar.

 

Small but growing companies

 

 

A website is vital for any business, and especially for a small one. Hiring in-house developers only to create and maintain a landing page is unreasonable, so you might want to find a freelancer instead.

 

Companies with irregular workloads

 

If your work implies working from project to project, keeping an in-house team of developers can cost you a lot. Outsourcing for freelancers for each particular project is better in this case.

 

Midterm projects

 

Projects which last up to one year can benefit from hiring freelancers significantly since it is a term too short to hire an in-house team of developers.

 

Projects on open-source e-commerce platforms

 

The advantage of an open-source e-commerce platform is the ability of a user to adjust it according to their needs. Hiring a freelancer for setup and maintenance is a good idea, in this case.

 

Freelance development: strengths

 

 

The advantages of freelance software development can make a world of difference if you use them wisely. Let us take a closer look.

 

  • Cost-efficiency. With the highest hourly rates of approximately $70 in the United States, freelance development is still a more affordable option than hiring development agencies. If you recruit in Eastern Europe, for example, prices go even lower.

 

  • Variety of available skills. On the market, you can find any set of development skills. Whatever it is that you need, you can hire a respective specialist in a couple of clicks.

 

  • Adaptability. Because of intense competition, freelancers need to keep at pace with modern trends in development.

 

  • Direct communication. There is no mediator between you as a customer and a developer. You can communicate all the specifications, wishes, and changes to the project directly to your developer.

 

  • Easier to supervise and manage. If you are of a controlling type, with the help of such tools as Trello or TeamViewer, you can directly monitor and influence the development process.

 

  • Availability. In-house developers work during a regular 8-hour workday, usually. Freelancers can work on your project whenever you need it.   

 

Freelance development: weaknesses

 

  • Reliability issues. Due to personal circumstances (e.g., sickness), or just because of irresponsibility a freelancer can withdraw from your project, and there are little to none ways you can prevent it

 

  • Safety. You must realize that any sensitive data and valuable information on the project you entrust to a freelancer cannot be protected as effectively, as when working with in-house teams

 

  • Recruiting by trial and error. Sometimes, you can have little means to ensure a freelancer is a pro before they start working on your project

 

  • Language and cultural barriers. If a freelancer has poor English skills, communicating with them might pose a problem. Cultural differences may become a source misunderstandings in the future

 

  • Quality assurance issues. If you are not a coder yourself, there are fewer ways for you to ensure a freelancer is doing a good job.        

 

Conclusion

 

Comparative analysis

 

The in-house vs. freelance comparison can be briefly displayed in the form of a table below:

 

 

As you can see, the advantages of freelance developers are mostly related to flexibility and efficiency in the short-time perspective. At the same time, according to research, in-house development is more reliable and safe, has less variation in the quality of work, and is more suitable for long-term projects.

 

Hire at Coding Ninjas

 

If you are looking for freelance developers for your project but feel unsure about how to do it right, try hiring at Coding Ninjas.

 

We carefully test outsourced developers for their professional, communicative, and English skills, and make sure only skilled and motivated ones get to work with our customers.

 

Many of our freelance developers work full-time, and their income depends on how well they perform. So, you will get to work with the most motivated and competent contractors.  

Contact us, and we will find you a specialist who suits your current needs the best.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading...

Vetted freelance developers ready to start working on your project today.

get a quote in just 15 minutes

You might also like

FILL OUT THE FORM
TO GET A QUOTE!
$149monthly plan
The Freelancer
  • 5 developer hours per month
  • Additional development time at $29/hour
  • Unused hours roll over up to three months*
  • Unlimited support 7 days a week
  • Cancel anytime
$495monthly plan
The Professional
  • 20 developer hours per month
  • Additional development time at $25/hour
  • Unused hours roll over up to three months*
  • Unlimited support 7 days a week
  • You can cancel at anytime
$1399monthly plan
The Business
  • 60 developer hours per month
  • Additional development time at $23/hour
  • Unused hours roll over up to three months*
  • Unlimited support 7 days a week
  • You can cancel at anytime

For 90 days from the date of each payment.